Anthropic recently published a research note where they look at 100,000 real conversations with their model Claude and ask a simple question:
How much faster does work get done when people use AI?
Their answer is slightly uncomfortable reading if you work in real estate or facilities.
Across all those conversations, Claude estimates that the typical task would take around an hour and a half without AI ... and that AI cuts about 80 percent of that time. When they extrapolate this to the wider US economy, they find a world where current AI could lift labour productivity growth by 1.8 percent a year over the next decade if it were adopted broadly. That is roughly double recent trends.
So yes... some people really are getting a four day week out of this thing.
The really interesting bit is where the time is being saved. People bring weighty tasks to Claude:
This is AI aimed squarely at knowledge work that happens in documents, spreadsheets and code.
Now think about a day in a facilities operation:
On paper, it is exactly the kind of messy, repetitive, information-heavy work where an 80 percent time saving would be transformational.
In practice, a lot of FM teams are still printing PDFs.
Anthropic are careful about caveats. They acknowledge that their method only sees what happens inside the chat window. It does not see:
So their numbers almost certainly overstate real productivity gains today.
But you do not need the full 1.8 percent to change an FM business. If you can:
... you are not just “slightly more efficient”. You are running a different operating model.
One of my favourite bits of the paper is their discussion of bottlenecks. AI turbocharges some tasks and barely touches others. For software developers, AI speeds up coding, testing and documentation, but it does not attend the stand-up or negotiate priorities. For teachers, it helps with lesson planning, not playground duty.
In facilities, the pattern will be even sharper:
It is worth adding a single word to the last two points ... 'yet'.
If we are not careful, AI will make the digital parts of FM beautifully fast while leaving the physical and organisational bottlenecks exactly where they are. The paperwork will be instant ... the lift will still be out of service.
So what do we do with a research paper that says “AI might double productivity” while we are still arguing about whose job it is to update the asset register
A few pragmatic thoughts from what we see at Cleverly:
Anthropic’s paper is ultimately about macro numbers and growth rates. Hidden inside it is a quieter claim... that current AI already delivers huge time savings in the right hands.
Real estate and facilities have all the ingredients to benefit:
We built Cleverly on the assumption that buildings should participate in this productivity story rather than sit outside it. That means AI woven directly into work orders, quotes, assets and suppliers... not yet another dashboard nobody logs into.
If AI is capable of adding 1–2 percent to national productivity by helping people write documents and code, it will be very interesting to see what happens when we point it squarely at blocked drains, fire doors and maintenance backlogs.
The research labs have done their bit. The question for our industry is whether we are ready to let our buildings catch up.
#workingcleverly